fauxklore

I spent Memorial Day weekend at Balticon. I’d attended bits and pieces virtually before, but had never gone in person. The drive to Baltimore was slow and annoying and my GPS screwed up on where I needed to turn to get into the parking garage at the conference hotel, but I managed to figure it out. I had made my plans too late to get into the Renaissance Harborplace Hotel, but it was a short walk to the Springfield Inn, which was perfectly adequate.

It’s been long enough since that weekend that I probably won’t remember every session I went to. On Friday night, I went to a panel on The Commercialization of Space, which included a friend of mine from storytelling. The focus was really on privatization, while I’d have preferred a broader view. After that, I walked around the art show and did a quick recon of things for sale. Then I decided that I needed sleep more than I needed to go to another session so walked up to my hotel and collapsed.

I started Saturday with I am the Very Model… which was a filk panel on patter songs. I was glad to see a mention of Sondheim’s “Getting Married Today” (from Company, which is one of the rare patter songs for a woman. I found the claim that patter songs are the forerunner of rap to be rather dubious, since I am fairly sure “The Signifying Monkey,” which is based on Yoruba folklore, predates Gilbert and Sullivan. Also, none of the panelists had an actual answer to my question on why the Major General’s song remains the most popular patter song for parodies, instead of, say, the nightmare song from Iolanthe or “Tchaikovsky” from Lady in the Dark. (Or, for that matter, Tom Lehrer’s “Lobachevsky.”) It was still an entertaining session and if you disagree with anything I’ve said, it really doesn’t matter

I went out for a short walk and lunch. After that, I know I went to a talk by Alan Doctor titled Wonderful News for Vampires - Synthetic Blood (True Blood?) is Being Developed. But I don’t remember anything specific about it. After that I went to hear Marc Aabrahams talk about Improbable Research and the Ig Nobel Prizes. That was the definite highlight of the con for me. I am, of course, familiar with the publication and the prize ceremony. I expected to laugh a lot and, indeed, I did.

Later in the afternoon, I went to a panel on My Favorite Monster. I did like that the panelists went beyond werewolves and vampires. Personally, I am particularly fond of the Hastrman, which is a Slavic water sprite that lives in rivers and eats children. The charming part is that it knits sweaters to keep the souls of its victims warm. I am reasonably sure that nobody has written about it in a science fiction or fantasy book. Yet. Later in the day, I couldn’t resist a panel titled Humorous Fantasy is a Serious Business. I think that the note I wrote on my phone which reads “The Cellphone Towers of Elfland” is probably a recommendation from this session. Also, I did buy Martin Berman-Gorvine’s book 100 Curses on Trump and Musk, which, alas, proved to be disappointing.

I started Sunday with a panel on The Folklore of Space. There were some interesting stories, but not really anything I hadn’t heard before. I followed that with a panel titled Ducks and How to Make Them Pay which was about as silly as the title suggests. (Note: I do not really have anything against ducks, although I do believe that eating duck increases the net intelligence of the universe. Geese, however, are the shittiest birds in the known universe.)

After a walk and lunch, I went to a panel on Non-European Folklore in SFF. This was fairly interesting and I was particularly glad that one of the panelists talked about African folklore - specifically, Nigerian folklore if I recall correctly. I followed that with a panel on Jews in Space: Jewish SF On and Off the Page. Of course, there was some discussion of Wandering Stars, a short story anthology that was revolutionary when it was published in 1974. The basic premise of the discussion was that there are a lot of Jewish SF writers, but few Jewish characters in their work. I don’t read enough SF to know how true that is, but I suspect that it could be because many of those Jewish authors are pretty assimilated.

Somewhere in there, I did a little bit of shopping. I’d been wanting to get Jasper Fforde’s Red Side Story (which is the sequel to Shades of Grey and I also bought a memoir I know a friend will want. (He may read this, so I am not giving more details.) I also couldn’t resist a bee-hive themed game tray. There were a few odds and ends I contemplated, but I am trying to declutter my life, so I restrained myself.

In the late afternoon, I went to a Classic Filk Sing-Along. I closed out Sunday with a talk by Brent Warner on A Fannish Introduction to Runes as a Writing System That was interesting, but there was a lot of distracting fiddling around with the presentation technology.

I think the only session I went to on Monday was a panel on Creation Myths, which was pretty interesting. There were other things I was interested in, but since it was Memorial Day, I was concerned about traffic driving home. It was slower than normal, but not as bad as Friday had been.

Overall, I enjoyed going to Balticon and was able to see a few friends who are regulars at it. I had my usual issue at all events, which is my inability to be in multiple places at the same time. I did a reasonable job of balancing things I wanted to go to without getting too exhausted. I would have liked to have checked out some of the game demos and watch some film screenings, but couldn’t make that work, mostly because I wasn’t staying in the con hotel.

But the biggest problem is the Memorial Day weekend is not really a great time for me to go to something like this, since it conflicts with other things I want to do. I’m likely to be traveling next year, for example. So, overall, going virtually and going to some events after the fact will have to do.

Someday I will remember how long it takes me to write up posts on multi-day events.

This past week was Yiddish New York, which was done as a hybrid conference this year. The lectures were entirely on-line, while music / concerts were live-streamed. As is typical of this sort of thing, I didn’t have time for nearly everything I wanted to see, but the recorded sessions will be available until mid-February, so I should be able to catch up some.

I went to all four sessions of Vayberishe Zabababones: The Forgotten Rituals and Minhagim of Eastern European Jewish Women presented by Annie Cohen. (Note: “minhagim” is Hebrew and Yiddish for “customs.”) She discussed several types of women’s religious roles, ranging from prayers to midwifery and more. For example, women created religious objects like the curtains around the Torah ark and the gartel (belt) wrapped around the Torah scroll. The major emphasis was on life events, e.g. birth, marriage, and death, all of which are points of transition. She talked a lot about people making a distinction between folk practices and formal religion.

Some of the rituals she talked about were really interesting. One was the “plague wedding,” which was a wedding (often between a poor bride and groom) held to ward off disease. Instead of the normal white chuppah (wedding canopy), a black chuppah was used. Apparently there was at least one example of a plague wedding being held in the context of COVID.

She talked at more length about measuring graves (or entire cemeteries), which was done with string, which was then used to make candles. This was done either during the month of Elul (the month before Rosh Hashanah) or at times of crisis. The idea was a mixture of calling on the dead to intervene on behalf of the living and setting boundaries. Apparently this practice goes back to the 12th century and was practiced at least through the 19th century.

Another major role was the "zagerin,” a female prayer leader. She knew how to read Hebrew and could translate to Yiddish, as well as call out prayers for other women to follow. There was a certain expectation that she would capture the emotional connection to prayer. She also worked with people visiting cemeteries and her first question to them would be “with tears or without,” which would influence how much money people should give her for her prayers.

Another role was healing, including acting as a midwife. Various healing practices were used, including passing an egg over the sick person, the cemetery measuring that was already mentioned, and placing grass from the cemetery at the head of a sick person. There was some discussion about whether Jewish law allows communication with he dead, but there was also a comment that the more Jewish texts forbid a practice, the more common that practice is.

Overall, this was a really interesting series of talks. I also watched a related 15 minute video, “di Zagerin,” (i.e. The woman Prayer Leader) which has to do with a woman who is angrily yelling that all the success the other women in town have is due to her efforts, but she has nothing. She vows to pray only for their downfall and for revenge. Her grandson is trying to soothe her, but fails.

There were related lectures on Reenchanting American Judaism: The Search for Ashkenazi WOmen’s Folk Magic & Ritual and Its Modern Day Potential by Rokhl Lafrissen. I only went to the first of those (on Sunday) because there was another talk I wanted to hear at the same time on Monday. One of her major points was that, in general, American Judaism is in harmony with American values, with an emphasis on the synagogue and life cycle events and tends to be hostile to the supernatural.

She talked about “The Curious Case of the Dybbuk Box,” which was the subject of two movies (and possibly some newspaper articles) around 2001. The story has to do with an antique dealer in Oregon and is a typical haunted object story. One movie was a Hollywood production (“Possession”) but the other is an Indian movie set in Mauritius, called “Dybbuk Box: The Curse is Real.”

In general, she divided folk magic and folk ritual into a few categories - divination, communication with the dead, and magical protection / healing rituals. One particular divination practice she discussed was the Chabad practice of choosing a random passage from the Rebbe’s letters in answer to a question or problem, i.e. bibliomancy. There is apparently at least one website that will do this for you. She also talked about a blog about “Jewitches,” i.e. Jewish women who also practice witchcraft.

The final talk I went to on Sunday was Off the Derekh by Malky Goldman. This is a term that refers to formerly religious people leaving (primarily) Chasidic communities. The lecture was in Yiddish, so I only followed about a third of it. She talked about her background, growing up in a Chasidic family before coming to Boro Park (part of Brooklyn), where she learned English to be able to deal with stores and doctors. She went on to study art at Hunter College. The biggest step into American culture was realizing it was okay to be an individual. If I followed this correctly, her husband is a scientist and basketball player. When she married him, she had to choose everything. She changed how she dressed and got involved with acting, which she said gave her inner child a good feeling. At the same time. she had to deal with her family, who took a “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy towards her, just telling other people that she was “in Manhattan.” She also had to fight for individuality with other people who assume everyone who is Off the Derek is the same. Overall, this was an interesting talk, or at least what I understood of it.

There were several music performances. The only one I listened to in real time was by Kateryna Ostrovsky, a Ukrainian Jew based in Hamburg, Germany, who performed a mix of songs, including some Brazilian ones. She was accompanied by Leandro Pellegrino on guitar. Pleasant enough, but nothing revolutionary. I will go back and listen to some of the other music segments, however.

I listened two talks by Vivi Lachs that had to do with the Jewish East End of London. The first of those was Where’s the Goy in the London Music Hall. Yiddish music halls were generally small venues, e.g. the back rooms of pubs. The audiences were almost entirely working class. While there were attempts to put on more serious theatre, those were not successful. The word “goy” to refer to a non-Jew was rarely used and, when used, was considered neither positive nor negative. Instead there were references to people like the Russian tsar, old retired men in Victoria Park, coal men, gamblers, and British police. There were a lot of songs with references to pogroms, Russia, and the tsar. Other songs had to do with London streets, e.g. a woman complaining that her British husband beats her or a man complaining about police enforcing vagrancy laws. (There were also Jewish gangs, by the way.) Other song topics included politics and sexual relationships. The best part of the presentation was her singing a few of the songs.

The other talk by Vivi Lachs I went to was Where’s the Goy on the London Yiddish Stage. She mostly focused on fictional slice-of-life newspaper stories, rather than actual plays. A lot of these seemed to have to do with conflict between new immigrants and the more established Anglo-Jewish community. For example, the Anglo-Jewish community supported the World War I draft, but few immigrants signed up until the draft became compulsory in 1916.

Amanda Miryem-Khaya Siegel gave a talk on Women on the Yiddish Stage. This is related to a publication and translation project that is not just about actresses, but also writers, directors, choreographers, etc. The work, done along with Dr. Alysa Quint started with a summer conference on Women, the City, and Yiddish Theater in 2016 and has progressed to include a collection of scholarly articles and translations of plays by women. Some of the performers who were discussed included Sophia Karp, who was the first woman to join the Yiddish theater and was forced to marry another member of the troupe to be considered respectable, Regina Prager who was mostly an opera singer, and Bertha Kalich, who was the first Jew to perform on the stage of the Romanian National Theatre and the first woman to perform Hamlet on the English stage. There was also a mention of an article (maybe a book) about women in the Lithuanian Yiddish Theatre in Kovno, which I should probably look for given thats where my roots are.

A very different presentation was Am Yisroel High: The Story of Jews and Cannabis by Eddy Portnoy. (This is a pun on the phrase “Am Yisroel Chai,” which means “the people of Israel live.”) This was related to a current exhibit at YIVO in New York at the Center for Jewish History Building. For those who are not familiar with YIVO, it was founded in Lithuania and moved to New York in 1940 and is sort of the Ashkenazi Jewish equivalent of the Smithsonian and the Library of Congress. Some of the things the exhibit discusses are documents relating to cannabis, e.g. a 1911 novel titled “Hashish,” the entry for “hemp” in the Yiddish Encyclopedic Dictionary, and various historic texts, including some found in the Cairo Gneza (a repository of Jewish religious books buried in a cemetery). Hashish was generally accepted by both Jews and Muslims in North Africa and some people think cannabis may be the “aromatic cane” used in making the fragrant mixture used for anointing and for burning in incense. Some of the people who were regular cannabis users include the revisionist Leader Ze’ev Jabotinsky, the poet Alan Ginsburg, and the astronomer Carl Sagan. Rafael Meshalem at Hebrew University was one of the first people to research medical marijuana and isolated both THC and CBD. Another point he made was that Jews often got involved in risky (i.e. illegal) businesses because of restrictions that kept them out of the legitimate economy. I was amused that he included not just cannabis and alcohol in this, but also comic books! This was an interesting talk and I might check out the exhibit the next time I am in New York, even though I have no intention of using cannabis.

One area of particular interest to me is novelty songs so I really enjoyed Uri Schreter’s talk on Micky Katz: Yinglish Comedy and the Continuity of Klezmer. For those who don’t recognize the name, Mickey Katz did a number of shows and records incorporating Yiddish and a broken English dialect into American music, but is probably best known these days as the father of Joel Gray. He played the clarinet in swing bands and started performing with Spike Jones in 1946, leading him to move to Los Angeles. Before that he had published a book of Yinglish parodies with stories like “Little Red Rosenberg” and “Yoshki and the Beanstalk.” He went out on his own in 1947, doing klezmerized versions of American songs. Some examples include “The Baby, the Bubbe, and You,” clearly based on “Bibbidy-Bobbidi-Boo. (“Bubbe” is Yiddish for “grandmother, by the way.) He also did shows like Borscht Capades. Anyway, the best part of this presentation was listening to all the clips. His work was played frequently in my house when I was growing up (though not as much as Allen Sherman) so I have fond memories of songs like “The Purple Kishke Eater,” “Duvid Crockett,” and “16 Tons of Delicatessen.” I liked the description of him as “the hyphen in the middle of American-Jewish culture.” However, he was controversial and some people were embarrassed by his dialect comedy and thought he was too crass.

Mickey Katz was also one of the people discussed in a talk by Miriam Isaacs on Language in Yiddish Vaudeville and Radio. Note that this talk was almost entirely in Yiddish, but was fairly easy for me to follow. But before him, she talked about the Rechnitzer Rejects who did songs like “Mein Boro Park” to the tune of “New York, New York” and “Balabustas” to the “Ghostbusters” theme. (A balabusta is basically a perfect housewife.) Other people who were mentioned include Sophie Tucker and Eli Basse. There were also diversions into subjects like what is called the “gefilte fish divide” and other differences between Litvaks and Galitzianers, e.g. Litvaks make money while Galitzianers make children. This was, again, fun mostly for the music clips.

The final presentation I went to was Yiddish Songs of Drunkenness by Bob Rothstein. Most of the folk songs he talked about are either sung by drunkards or about drinking, while Slavic folk songs often deal with people dealing with drunks. One interesting thing he mentioned was that in 1863 Russian Empire laws changed from tavern leases to state monopolies on taverns, which some people disliked because Jewish tavern keepers gave credit, while the government didn’t. The only song I particularly noted was one about a drunkard’s testament in which he wants to be buried with liquor.

Overall, there was a lot of interesting material here. And there are still several talks (and music performances) I want to go back and watch/listen to the recordings of. Definitely worth my time (and the conference fee.)

The International Association of Jewish Genealogical Societies annual conference was in August. It had originally been scheduled to be in San Diego but, like everything else in the year of the plague, moved on-line. I thought it was still worth using four days of vacation time for and I was right about that. They had live sessions (some of which were recorded), as well as several pre-recorded sessions, with recorded sessions available for 60 days after the conference ended. Which is why I am only writing about it now, which is, admittedly, still over a month after the recorded access ended.

Day 1 started with a plenary session. They talked briefly about the conference logistics and announced that next year’s conference will be August 2-5th in Philadelphia, G-d willing. Then Arthur Kurzweil and Sallyann Sack-Pikus gave a retrospective talk, discussing what has changed in Jewish genealogy over the past 40 or so years. I particularly liked Arthur’s comment that our deceased ancestors are often easier to get along with than our living ones. He also had an amusing anecdote about somebody looking for a Lithuanian shtetl called Unk-anowan. That was, of course, a misinterpretation of “unknown” on a record.

After that, I had to make decisions about what to listen to live, vs. recorded. I chose Introduction to DNA Research for Jewish Genealogy, but that proved to be rather more basic than I needed. There was still useful information, but I am still prioritizing more conventional genealogy techniques and focused on what records are newly available.

They had a longish break, which I used to watch a recorded session by Avrohom Krauss about Landsmanshaftn. I usually think of these in terms of burial societies, but he noted several other functions, e.g. workers’ compensation, health insurance, and old age homes. Nor were all of them associated with specific places, with some being (for example) political. There are still some administrative records at YIVO, but they aren’t on-line. So there is another thing for me to spend some time with, since I know that much of my maternal grandfather’s family is buried in the plot for a landsmanshaft for Tiktin (i.e. Tykocin, Poland). He also suggested looking at societies for nearby communities.

I put a high priority on the sessions for Special Interest Groups and other research divisions, since those were not being recorded, though several of them had handouts available. I went to the Belarus Research Division meeting and to the JRI-Poland session. The latter was more useful, with a focus on upcoming website updates. There was also a lot of opportunity for making potential connections with other attendees via the chat function, some of which I still have to follow-up on.

The highlight of Day 1 was a presentation by Scott Genzer on Using Facial Recognition to Identify Unnamed Ancestors for Genealogical Research. The idea is that one could compare an unidentified photo to a large collection of known photos. The catch is, of course, that one needs that large collection of known photos, but I think that, in the long run, this could be as revolutionary as DNA research was a few years ago. He did also bring up various ethical considerations, e.g. privacy issues. But this is still exciting research.

The final presentation I went to on Day 1 was Memory and Mystery: Breaking Down Family Lore by Emily Garber. I think I may have heard a version of this presentation before, since I seem to remember examples she had of stories that don’t hold together. Her basic point was that you need to identify the source of a story and research the component parts of it to see what does and doesn’t make sense. I have some good examples in my own family, particularly the claim that my great-great-grandfather was murdered on his 10oth birthday by Hitler personally. There’s just this little catch that he was shown as already deceased when my great-grandmother married quite a number of years earlier. (Nor is there any evidence that Hitler directly murdered anyone.)

I started day 2 with the Litvak SIG meeting. I’ve probably mentioned before that Litvak SIG has been my most useful source for research on my father’s side of the family, particularly within Kaunas Gubernia. The main thing I learned is that thee is a life membership, which includes access to all District Research Groups. That is something I need to get around to doing.

The presentation on the Jewish Record Collection on Ancestry was fairly basic. I don’t think there was a lot that I didn’t already know, though there were a few tidbits here and there, particularly related to newly added collections. There was also good information on using wild cards.. So it wasn’t useless.

I have more reservations about Deborah Glassman’s presentation on Researching Whole Jewish Community to Better Research Your Ancestors because I think she was mistaken on a few points. For example, she said that in 1805, only one family in a given town could have a particular surname,, while I am fairly sure I have seen counterexamples. She also referred to several types of records (e.g. ones re: people sharing the same occupation) without providing information about how to find these. None of this was helped by her having a glitchy internet connection. So I found this presentation disappointing.

The Jewish Genealogy Portal presentation came across as largely a commercial for geni.com, combined with an attack on other Facebook groups for Jewish genealogy. Blah.

The JewishGen.org annual meeting included the usual plea for money. There was a mention that a search button on the mailing list would be useful, but I couldn’t tell if that means they plan to add one. There was also a mention that the Latvia Research Division updates include part of Vitebsk Gubernia, which is of some interest to me, wince part of my family lived in that area.

I finished Day 2 with the panel discussion on Finding Our Ancestral Towns. While there were a couple of good points (e.g. setting aside 1-2 hours a week for research), I can’t say there was much I didn’t know. And the panel was particularly plagued with internet connectivity issues. I will choose to believe that one panelist, who only managed to stay connected long enough to answer one question, would have been brilliant.

This is getting long, so I think I will continue this write-up in another post. Or, more likely, two other posts, since there were several presentations I listened to after the formal conference was over.